Subject: | "backup" command conflicts with Coda's "backup" |
Date: | Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:43:42 -0600 |
To: | openafs-bugs@openafs.org |
From: | Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com> |
Originally reported to RPM Fusion at https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/1727
From the mailing list discussion last year about this, the consensus
was to rename "backup" to "afsbackup".
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
To: Jason Edgecombe <jason@rampaginggeek.com>
Cc: "Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)" <chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>,
Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com>, openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] /usr/sbin/backup
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 11:33:48 -0700
Jason Edgecombe <jason@rampaginggeek.com> writes:
Yeah, that sounds even better to me.
From the mailing list discussion last year about this, the consensus
was to rename "backup" to "afsbackup".
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
To: Jason Edgecombe <jason@rampaginggeek.com>
Cc: "Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)" <chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>,
Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com>, openafs-info@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] /usr/sbin/backup
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 11:33:48 -0700
Jason Edgecombe <jason@rampaginggeek.com> writes:
> On 07/04/2011 10:14 AM, Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR) wrote:
>> based on other commands, there would appear to be precedent for either
>> prefixing an a (aklog) or an afs (afsmonitor)
>> prefixing an a (aklog) or an afs (afsmonitor)
> afsbackup sounds ok.
Yeah, that sounds even better to me.